Questions & Answers BLM National Sage-Grouse Conservation
Strategy
What is the purpose of the BLM National Sage-Grouse Habitat
Conservation Strategy (“Strategy”)? The purpose of the
Strategy is to conserve and improve sage-grouse habitat so as to stabilize
and improve sage-grouse populations on public land. The Strategy will
serve as the overarching umbrella for the Bureau’s management of sagebrush
habitat found on public lands.
What overall vision does the Strategy hold? The
vision of the Strategy is to manage public land in a manner that will
maintain, enhance and restore sage-grouse and sagebrush habitats while
providing for multiple uses of lands under BLM stewardship. The Strategy
uses sound science, draws on BLM’s 30 years of experience and success in
sagebrush conservation, and reinforces the importance of working in
cooperation with States as the Bureau translates its broad knowledge and
experience into action at the local and regional levels.
What are the main goals outlined in the Strategy?
Developing a consistent and effective management framework for
addressing the conservation needs of sage-grouse on public lands.
Increasing understanding of resource conditions and priorities for
maintaining and restoring habitat.
Expanding and enhancing available research and data that support
effective sage-grouse management.
Continuing to develop partnerships to enhance effective habitat
management.
Ensuring that leadership and resources are adequate to implement
conservation strategies at the National, State and local levels.
What threats to sage-grouse and their habitat are addressed in
the Strategy? No single factor is the cause of declining
sage-grouse populations. But since the beginning of settlement in the
West, numerous activities have adversely affected the number of birds and
the amount, distribution and quality of sagebrush habitats:
habitat loss and degradation
habitat fragmentation
altered fire regimes
sagebrush destruction
woodland encroachment
weed infestation
rehabilitation challenges
pesticide application
drought
structures (e.g., power lines, fences, water developments, wind
turbines)
How does this document relate to the Draft Strategy
released in June 2003? The BLM issued a Draft Strategy in June
2003 and took public comment on it until November 1, 2003. Individuals and
agencies concerned with sage-grouse conservation submitted an extensive
amount of information during the comment period. The Final Strategy
reflects the most current information and the many comments received from
the public, state agencies, industry and special interest groups.
Does the National Strategy replace various conservation
strategies and plans being developed by state and local working groups
across the West? No. The National Strategy describes
management practices designed to support and promote the range-wide
conservation of sagebrush habitats for sage-grouse and other
sagebrush-dependent wildlife species. It will guide BLM field offices
until state- and local-level sage-grouse conservation plans developed in
collaboration with state wildlife experts are completed and made part of
BLM's land use plans.
BLM State and
Field Offices will use the guidance in the National Strategy until the
Bureau and its partners (1) finalize and adopt BLM State-level strategies
and/or state wildlife agency-led sage-grouse conservation plans, and/or
(2) incorporate specific habitat objectives and conservation measures
developed in collaboration with state wildlife agencies and local working
groups into appropriate BLM planning documents. Guidance in the National
Strategy may be modified to best fit local and regional conditions and to
reflect progress in efforts to complete State-level strategies.
How does this document relate to the Conservation
Assessment released in June 2004 by the Western Association of Fish
and Wildlife Agencies (WAFWA)? In finalizing the Strategy, the
BLM carefully considered WAFWA’s
assessment (11.6MB PDF) of current status and trends in sage-grouse
populations and habitats across the West, the first assessment of its
kind. Information from the assessment was carefully reviewed and
incorporated into the Strategy where appropriate.
How will BLM use and implement the Strategy? The
Strategy will provide consistent guidance for BLM State offices as they
develop and implement State-level habitat conservation strategies for the
public lands they manage. Implementation will occur through ongoing
planning and through development of a management framework that will
consistently and effectively address sage-grouse conservation needs.
Adequate resources and leadership will be secured and devoted to ensure
success.
What process will BLM use for implementing the
Strategy? The land use planning
process authorized by the Federal Land
Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) will be the primary mechanism for
making decisions and taking action to conserve and restore sage-grouse and
sagebrush habitats as directed in the Strategy. The process maximizes the
opportunity for the kind of public involvement that is a platform for
applying scientific knowledge and past experience to future conservation
efforts. Land use plans are also flexible enough to be amended where
necessary to integrate conservation goals outlined in the Strategy.
How does the Strategy account for the impacts of sage-grouse
conservation on other uses and activities on the public
lands? The land use planning
process will consider the effects of sage-grouse and sagebrush
conservation on other uses of public land – including recreation, energy
development, livestock grazing, mining and fire management – and how other
public land activities can be integrated with the conservation effort.
In addition, BLM specialists and managers actively support efforts to
conserve sage-grouse on lands managed by other government agencies or by
private entities. This ensures the cooperative, sustained, broad-scale,
multi-jurisdictional action that has already yielded on-the-ground successes
in numerous places.
How would a decision to list the sage-grouse as an endangered
or threatened species affect the Strategy? On or before
December 29, 2004 the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service will submit a
finding on whether listing
the Greater sage-grouse as threatened or endangered is warranted under
the Endangered Species Act. Preparation of the Strategy was initiated as
part of the federal contribution to conserving sagebrush habitat under an
agreement with WAFWA signed in 2000, well before the listing petition was
filed. The Strategy is designed to build on this cooperative conservation
effort and to enhance its effectiveness. Therefore, the listing process
does not affect the content of the Strategy.
In recent years, the BLM has been managing sage-grouse according to
Bureau policies for special-status (sensitive) species. In addition, BLM
involvement in sage-grouse and sagebrush habitat conservation predates by
decades the more recent efforts at coordinated, rangewide conservation. If
the sage-grouse were listed under the ESA, sage-grouse management would
then be conducted under a defined regulatory process that could shift the
emphasis away from cooperative conservation efforts. This could affect a
wide scope of activities conducted or authorized by the BLM. However, the
Strategy itself envisions the same conservation objectives that underlie
the ESA.
What is next for the Strategy and for BLM’s efforts to conserve
sage-grouse on public lands? By early 2005 BLM State Offices
will develop conservation strategies for sagebrush habitat in their
jurisdictions that will coordinate with the BLM National Strategy. All BLM
land use plans will continue to be reviewed and revised as necessary to
support ongoing implementation of sage-grouse conservation strategies.
The Bureau will continue to develop and implement conservation projects
at the local level in the spirit of Interior Secretary Gale Norton’s 4 C’s
philosophy of communication, cooperation and consultation in the
service of conservation.
The BLM will also report annually on progress in implementing the
Strategy and will modify the Strategy as needed.
Who are the BLM’s partners in sage-grouse habitat
conservation? In keeping with Interior Secretary Norton’s 4 C’s
philosophy, communication, cooperation and consultation among federal
and state agencies, American Indian tribes, BLM Resource Advisory Councils
at the state level, conservation groups, and individual stakeholders have
supported BLM’s conservation planning and actions.
State wildlife management agencies were especially important as the
Strategy was drafted. The Western Association of Wildlife Management
Agencies (WAFWA) completed the first-ever rangewide
assessment (11.6MB PDF) of current conditions on sagebrush habitat
across the West. This assessment provided a much needed baseline for
conservation planning.
States, particularly through the Western Governors
Association, have also been partners in developing best management practices (BMPs) for
authorized uses and management activities on BLM-administered public land
and ensuring that sage-grouse conservation is addressed in all facets of
state-level land use planning.